BSCV vs QQQ
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
BSCV has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BSCV offers more diversification with 433 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCV | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.72% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 433 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.15% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.52% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.62% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.00% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BSCV vs QQQ Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSCV returned +2.52% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, BSCV is up 0.15% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, BSCV compounded at +6.62% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +0.00% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.4% for BSCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for BSCV and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCV charges 0.10% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $18 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCV currently yields 4.72% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCV or QQQ?
BSCV has an expense ratio of 0.10% while QQQ charges 0.18%. BSCV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSCV or QQQ?
Over the past year BSCV returned +2.52% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BSCV annualized +0.00% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSCV or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.4% for BSCV. Worst drawdown: BSCV -23.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BSCV and QQQ?
BSCV and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCV and QQQ?
BSCV and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 435 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCV or QQQ?
BSCV yields 4.72% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BSCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.