BSVO vs IVV
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BSVO or IVV?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BSVO led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. BSVO is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSVO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 639 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +20.63%Best | +12.76% |
| 1Y Return | +26.26%Best | +15.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.47% | +22.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.5% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $17,345 | $21,051Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.0%Best | 38.1% |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 13, 2023 to Oct 1, 2026 (3.6 years).
BSVO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
BSVO vs IVV Performance
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSVO returned +26.26% while IVV returned +15.57%. Year to date, BSVO is up 20.63% versus a gain of 12.76% for IVV.
Over three years, BSVO compounded at +18.47% per year against +22.95% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +22.97% annualized vs +16.53%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSVO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.5% for BSVO and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSVO charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSVO currently yields 1.21% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 627 holdings in BSVO and 505 in IVV, totalling 99.7% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 627 positions we hold weights for in BSVO and 505 in IVV, against full books of 639 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 497 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BSVO (99.3% of the fund), and 540 for BSVO that do not appear in IVV (92.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSVO and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSVO or IVV?
BSVO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSVO or IVV?
Over the past year BSVO returned +26.26% vs +15.57% for IVV, so BSVO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BSVO annualized +16.53% vs +22.97% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSVO or IVV?
BSVO has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BSVO -27.5% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BSVO and IVV?
BSVO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSVO or IVV?
BSVO yields 1.21% while IVV yields 1.06%, so BSVO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BSVO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. BSVO led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. BSVO is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.