BSVO vs VXUS
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BSVO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSVO | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.4B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 630 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +27.72% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.47% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.09% | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2010 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BSVO vs VXUS Performance
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is a ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSVO returned +40.47% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, BSVO is up 27.72% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Over three years, BSVO compounded at +18.09% per year against +19.79% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, BSVO has the edge at +19.23% annualized vs +4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSVO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.5% for BSVO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSVO charges 0.45% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $5 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSVO currently yields 1.21% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BSVO and VXUS share 9 holdings out of 8470 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSVO or VXUS?
BSVO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSVO or VXUS?
Over the past year BSVO returned +40.47% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so BSVO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSVO annualized +19.23% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSVO or VXUS?
BSVO has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BSVO -27.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BSVO and VXUS?
BSVO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSVO and VXUS?
BSVO and VXUS share 9 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8470 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSVO or VXUS?
BSVO yields 1.21% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.