BSVO vs QQQ
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BSVO delivered stronger 1-year returns. BSVO offers more diversification with 630 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSVO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2.5B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 630 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +28.85% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.15% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.93% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2010 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BSVO vs QQQ Performance
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is a ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSVO returned +40.15% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, BSVO is up 28.85% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, BSVO compounded at +18.93% per year against +26.64% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, BSVO has the edge at +19.50% annualized vs +13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.7% for BSVO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.5% for BSVO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSVO charges 0.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSVO currently yields 1.21% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BSVO and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 736 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSVO or QQQ?
BSVO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSVO or QQQ?
Over the past year BSVO returned +40.15% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so BSVO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSVO annualized +19.50% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSVO or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.7% for BSVO. Worst drawdown: BSVO -27.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BSVO and QQQ?
BSVO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSVO and QQQ?
BSVO and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 736 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSVO or QQQ?
BSVO yields 1.21% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BSVO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.