BSVO vs SCHD
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. BSVO delivered stronger 1-year returns. BSVO offers more diversification with 618 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSVO | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $2.4B | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.21% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 630 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +27.72% | +25.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.47% | +31.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.09% | +15.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.61% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.7% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.5% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Bridgeway Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2010 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BSVO vs SCHD Performance
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is a ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BSVO returned +40.47% while SCHD returned +31.06%. Year to date, BSVO is up 27.72% versus a gain of 25.58% for SCHD.
Over three years, BSVO compounded at +18.09% per year against +15.55% for SCHD. Across the full 3-year window we track, BSVO has the edge at +19.23% annualized vs +11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSVO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.5% for BSVO and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSVO charges 0.45% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $6 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSVO currently yields 1.21% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BSVO and SCHD share 13 holdings out of 705 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSVO or SCHD?
BSVO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSVO or SCHD?
Over the past year BSVO returned +40.47% vs +31.06% for SCHD, so BSVO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSVO annualized +19.23% vs +11.46% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSVO or SCHD?
BSVO has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: BSVO -27.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BSVO and SCHD?
BSVO and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSVO and SCHD?
BSVO and SCHD share 13 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 705 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSVO or SCHD?
BSVO yields 1.21% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.