BSVO vs VTI

BSVO vs VTI

Which is better, BSVO or VTI?

Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. BSVO led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. BSVO is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: BSVO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBSVOVTI
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%Best
AUM$2.4B$690.1B
Dividend Yield1.21%1.03%
Holdings6393,524
YTD Return+21.71%Best+13.35%
1Y Return+27.69%Best+15.92%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.51%+23.41%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.83%
Volatility (annualized)19.5%12.8%Best
Max Drawdown-27.5%-19.3%Best
$10,000 over 3.6 years$17,496$20,824Best
Top 10 Weight8.0%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyBridgeway FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 31, 2010May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 13, 2023 to Oct 2, 2026 (3.6 years).

BSVO vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.

BSVO vs VTI Performance

EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) is an ETF from Bridgeway Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSVO returned +27.69% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, BSVO is up 21.71% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.

Over three years, BSVO compounded at +19.51% per year against +23.41% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +22.60% annualized vs +16.81%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BSVO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 12.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.5% for BSVO and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BSVO charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSVO currently yields 1.21% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

BSVO already in VTI88.0%
VTI already in BSVO0.1%

88.0% of BSVO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings BSVO also owns.

Most of BSVO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

558 positions in common, counted across the 627 positions we hold weights for in BSVO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 639 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,137 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BSVO (97.3% of the fund), and 34 for BSVO that do not appear in VTI (6.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BSVOWeight in VTIDifference
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.0.88%0.01%0.87%
HPHelmerich & Payne, Inc.0.86%0.00%0.86%
PTENPatterson-Uti Energy Inc0.84%0.01%0.83%
VSATViasat Inc0.83%0.01%0.82%
VSCOVICTORIA'S SECRET & CO0.80%0.01%0.79%
PARRPar Pacific Holdings Inc0.79%0.01%0.78%
CRGYCrescent Energ-A0.75%0.00%0.75%
BFHBread Financial Holdings, Inc.0.73%0.01%0.72%
SIG:LNSignet Jewelers Limited Common Shares0.71%0.01%0.70%
WSBCWesbanco, Inc.0.70%0.01%0.69%

88.0% of BSVO is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BSVOVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BSVO or VTI?

BSVO has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BSVO or VTI?

Over the past year BSVO returned +27.69% vs +15.92% for VTI, so BSVO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BSVO annualized +16.81% vs +22.60% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BSVO or VTI?

BSVO has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 12.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BSVO -27.5% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both BSVO and VTI?

BSVO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BSVO and VTI?

88.0% of BSVO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings BSVO also owns. They hold 558 positions in common, counted across the 627 positions we hold weights for in BSVO and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, BSVO or VTI?

BSVO yields 1.21% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BSVO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than BSVO?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. BSVO led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. BSVO is less concentrated, with 8.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.