BUFC vs VOO
BUFC vs VOO
AB Conservative Buffer ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BUFC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.37% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.27% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -8.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BUFC vs VOO Performance
AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) is a ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BUFC returned +8.27% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, BUFC is up 4.37% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 3.5% for BUFC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.3% for BUFC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BUFC charges 0.69% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BUFC currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BUFC and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BUFC or VOO?
BUFC has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BUFC or VOO?
Over the past year BUFC returned +8.27% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BUFC annualized +8.04% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BUFC or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 3.5% for BUFC. Worst drawdown: BUFC -8.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BUFC and VOO?
BUFC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BUFC and VOO?
BUFC and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BUFC or VOO?
BUFC yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.