BULD vs VYM
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BULD or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BULD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BULD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.89% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 65 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +31.52%Best | +14.82% |
| 1Y Return | +53.20%Best | +20.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.56%Best | +18.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.9% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.6% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $17,800Best | $16,920 |
| Top 10 Weight | 65.5% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 4, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 5, 2022 to Sep 4, 2026 (4.3 years).
BULD vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
BULD vs VYM Performance
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BULD returned +53.20% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, BULD is up 31.52% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, BULD compounded at +20.56% per year against +18.64% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, BULD has the edge at +14.35% annualized vs +13.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BULD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.9% compared with 13.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.6% for BULD and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BULD charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BULD currently yields 0.89% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
3.3% of BULD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's money is in holdings BULD also owns.
BULD and VYM share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in BULD and 603 in VYM, against full books of 65 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 566 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BULD (96.8% of the fund), and 21 for BULD that do not appear in VYM (56.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BULD and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BULD or VYM?
BULD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BULD or VYM?
Over the past year BULD returned +53.20% vs +20.84% for VYM, so BULD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BULD annualized +14.35% vs +13.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BULD or VYM?
BULD has been the more volatile fund at 26.9% annualized versus 13.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BULD -27.6% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both BULD and VYM?
BULD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BULD and VYM?
3.3% of BULD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's is in holdings BULD also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in BULD and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BULD or VYM?
BULD yields 0.89% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BULD?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BULD led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.