BULD vs QQQ

BULD vs QQQ

Which is better, BULD or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BULD led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.8%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBULDQQQ
Expense Ratio0.49%0.18%Best
AUM$15M$498.6B
Dividend Yield0.84%0.42%
Holdings65321
YTD Return+41.17%Best+22.67%
1Y Return+39.43%Best+24.33%
3Y Return (annualized)+27.78%+29.05%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+17.00%
Volatility (annualized)26.7%19.8%Best
Max Drawdown-27.6%-22.8%Best
$10,000 over 4.4 years$19,163$24,564Best
Top 10 Weight64.8%47.2%Best
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 4, 2022Mar 10, 1999

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 5, 2022 to Oct 2, 2026 (4.4 years).

BULD vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.

BULD vs QQQ Performance

Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BULD returned +39.43% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, BULD is up 41.17% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.

Over three years, BULD compounded at +27.78% per year against +29.05% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +22.66% annualized vs +15.93%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BULD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.7% compared with 19.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.6% for BULD and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BULD charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BULD currently yields 0.84% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

BULD already in QQQ35.1%
QQQ already in BULD5.4%

35.1% of BULD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings BULD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

6 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in BULD and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 65 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 91 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BULD (93.0% of the fund), and 21 for BULD that do not appear in QQQ (30.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BULDWeight in QQQDifference
ADSKAutodesk, Inc.9.05%0.20%8.85%
LRCXLam Research Corp6.92%1.64%5.28%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.6.85%1.60%5.25%
ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv7.58%0.69%6.89%
KLACKla Corp3.58%1.04%2.54%
TERTeradyne Inc - Common1.11%0.26%0.85%

35.1% of BULD is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BULDQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BULD or QQQ?

BULD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BULD or QQQ?

Over the past year BULD returned +39.43% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so BULD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BULD annualized +15.93% vs +22.66% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BULD or QQQ?

BULD has been the more volatile fund at 26.7% annualized versus 19.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BULD -27.6% vs QQQ -22.8%.

Should I hold both BULD and QQQ?

BULD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BULD and QQQ?

35.1% of BULD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.4% of QQQ's is in holdings BULD also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in BULD and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, BULD or QQQ?

BULD yields 0.84% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so BULD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than BULD?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BULD led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.