BULD vs QQQ
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BULD delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BULD | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $17M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.89% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 65 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +42.16% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +60.46% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.04% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 4, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BULD vs QQQ Performance
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BULD returned +60.46% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, BULD is up 42.16% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, BULD compounded at +24.04% per year against +26.25% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, BULD has the edge at +16.67% annualized vs +13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 27.6% for BULD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.6% for BULD and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BULD charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BULD currently yields 0.89% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BULD and QQQ share 5 holdings out of 159 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BULD or QQQ?
BULD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BULD or QQQ?
Over the past year BULD returned +60.46% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so BULD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BULD annualized +16.67% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BULD or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 27.6% for BULD. Worst drawdown: BULD -27.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BULD and QQQ?
BULD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BULD and QQQ?
BULD and QQQ share 5 common holdings with a 5.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 159 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BULD or QQQ?
BULD yields 0.89% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BULD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.