BULD vs QQQ
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BULD or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BULD led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BULD | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.89% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 65 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +30.28%Best | +17.33% |
| 1Y Return | +54.00%Best | +26.50% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.20% | +24.58%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.15% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.0% | 20.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.6% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $17,633 | $23,399Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 65.5% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 4, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 5, 2022 to Sep 3, 2026 (4.3 years).
BULD vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
BULD vs QQQ Performance
Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BULD returned +54.00% while QQQ returned +26.50%. Year to date, BULD is up 30.28% versus a gain of 17.33% for QQQ.
Over three years, BULD compounded at +20.20% per year against +24.58% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +21.86% annualized vs +14.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BULD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.0% compared with 20.0% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.6% for BULD and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BULD charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BULD currently yields 0.89% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
28.5% of BULD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings BULD also owns.
BULD and QQQ share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in BULD and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 65 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 91 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BULD (92.4% of the fund), and 20 for BULD that do not appear in QQQ (31.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
28.5% of BULD is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BULD or QQQ?
BULD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BULD or QQQ?
Over the past year BULD returned +54.00% vs +26.50% for QQQ, so BULD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BULD annualized +14.10% vs +21.86% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BULD or QQQ?
BULD has been the more volatile fund at 27.0% annualized versus 20.0% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: BULD -27.6% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both BULD and QQQ?
BULD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BULD and QQQ?
28.5% of BULD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.2% of QQQ's is in holdings BULD also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in BULD and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BULD or QQQ?
BULD yields 0.89% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BULD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BULD?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BULD led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.