BXSL vs VYM

BXSL vs VYM

Which is better, BXSL or VYM?

Bank Loan against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBXSLVYM
Expense Ratio11.03%0.04%Best
AUM-$81.6B
Dividend Yield-2.22%
Holdings1613
YTD Return+0.18%+11.47%Best
1Y Return+3.42%+15.94%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+7.26%+18.03%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.73%+12.35%Best
Volatility (annualized)17.3%13.8%Best
Max Drawdown-36.8%-15.8%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,197$17,901Best
Fund FamilyThe Blackstone Group IncVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleBank LoanLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 26, 2018Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 28, 2021 to Sep 21, 2026 (4.9 years).

BXSL vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.

BXSL vs VYM Performance

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) is an ETF from The Blackstone Group Inc and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BXSL returned +3.42% while VYM returned +15.94%. Year to date, BXSL is up 0.18% versus a gain of 11.47% for VYM.

Over three years, BXSL compounded at +7.26% per year against +18.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.73% and +12.35% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BXSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 13.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for BXSL and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BXSL charges 11.03% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $1103 vs $4 annually, a gap of $1099 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in BXSL and 557 in VYM, totalling 0.0% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in BXSL and 557 in VYM, against full books of 1 and 613.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BXSL and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BXSLVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BXSL or VYM?

BXSL has an expense ratio of 11.03% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $1099 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BXSL or VYM?

Over the past year BXSL returned +3.42% vs +15.94% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BXSL or VYM?

BXSL has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 13.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BXSL -36.8% vs VYM -15.8%.

Should I hold both BXSL and VYM?

BXSL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Is VYM better than BXSL?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.