CANE vs IVV
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CANE | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $56M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.69% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.82% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -7.57% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.11% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2011 | May 15, 2000 |
CANE vs IVV Performance
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF (CANE) is a ETF from Teucrium and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CANE returned -2.82% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, CANE is up 11.69% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, CANE compounded at -7.57% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +3.11% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CANE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.3% for CANE and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CANE charges 1.00% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CANE currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CANE and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CANE or IVV?
CANE has an expense ratio of 1.00% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CANE or IVV?
Over the past year CANE returned -2.82% vs +23.01% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CANE annualized -5.57% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CANE or IVV?
CANE has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CANE -81.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CANE and IVV?
CANE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CANE and IVV?
CANE and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CANE or IVV?
CANE yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.