CANE vs VTI
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CANE or VTI?
Agriculture against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CANE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $59M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 14 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +18.89%Best | +11.06% |
| 1Y Return | +7.35% | +15.41%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -9.02% | +20.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.61% | +11.52%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -81.3% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,940 | $17,249Best |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Agriculture | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 19, 2011 to Sep 16, 2026 (15 years).
CANE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CANE vs VTI Performance
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF (CANE) is an ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CANE returned +7.35% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, CANE is up 18.89% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Over three years, CANE compounded at -9.02% per year against +20.48% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.61% and +11.52% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.25% annualized vs -5.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CANE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 14.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.3% for CANE and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.16. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CANE charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CANE currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CANE and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 17.9% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CANE and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 14 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CANE and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CANE or VTI?
CANE has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CANE or VTI?
Over the past year CANE returned +7.35% vs +15.41% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CANE annualized -5.14% vs +13.25% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CANE or VTI?
CANE has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 14.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CANE -81.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both CANE and VTI?
CANE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CANE or VTI?
CANE yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CANE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.