CANE vs QQQ
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CANE | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $56M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.05% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.63% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.80% | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.29% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2011 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CANE vs QQQ Performance
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF (CANE) is a ETF from Teucrium and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CANE returned -1.63% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, CANE is up 13.05% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Over three years, CANE compounded at -6.80% per year against +25.51% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +3.29% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs -5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.8% for CANE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.3% for CANE and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.12. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CANE charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CANE currently yields 0.00% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CANE and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 104 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CANE or QQQ?
CANE has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CANE or QQQ?
Over the past year CANE returned -1.63% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CANE annualized -5.49% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CANE or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.8% for CANE. Worst drawdown: CANE -81.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CANE and QQQ?
CANE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.12, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CANE and QQQ?
CANE and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CANE or QQQ?
CANE yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.