CANE vs VXUS
CANE vs VXUS
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CANE | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $56M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +11.17% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.16% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.70% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.68% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2011 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CANE vs VXUS Performance
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF (CANE) is a ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CANE returned -1.16% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CANE is up 11.17% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, CANE compounded at -6.70% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.68% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs -5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CANE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.3% for CANE and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CANE charges 1.00% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $5 annually, a gap of $95 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CANE currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CANE and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CANE or VXUS?
CANE has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $95 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CANE or VXUS?
Over the past year CANE returned -1.16% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CANE annualized -5.60% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CANE or VXUS?
CANE has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CANE -81.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CANE and VXUS?
CANE and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CANE and VXUS?
CANE and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CANE or VXUS?
CANE yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.