CANE vs VOO
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CANE | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $56M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 13 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.17% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.16% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.70% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.68% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -81.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 19, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CANE vs VOO Performance
Teucrium Sugar Fund ETF (CANE) is a ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CANE returned -1.16% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, CANE is up 11.17% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, CANE compounded at -6.70% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.68% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs -5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CANE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -81.3% for CANE and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CANE charges 1.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CANE currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CANE and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CANE or VOO?
CANE has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CANE or VOO?
Over the past year CANE returned -1.16% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), CANE annualized -5.60% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CANE or VOO?
CANE has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CANE -81.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CANE and VOO?
CANE and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CANE and VOO?
CANE and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CANE or VOO?
CANE yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.