CCRV vs VYM
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCRV | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $27M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.31% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 91 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -0.70% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.35% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.74% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.07% | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 1, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CCRV vs VYM Performance
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCRV returned +1.35% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, CCRV is down 0.70% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, CCRV compounded at +3.74% per year against +18.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.07% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, CCRV has the edge at +14.07% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.2% for CCRV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.8% for CCRV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCRV charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCRV currently yields 4.31% against 2.24% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCRV or VYM?
CCRV has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCRV or VYM?
Over the past year CCRV returned +1.35% vs +22.16% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CCRV annualized +14.07% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCRV or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.2% for CCRV. Worst drawdown: CCRV -24.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CCRV and VYM?
CCRV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCRV or VYM?
CCRV yields 4.31% while VYM yields 2.24%, so CCRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.