CCRV vs VOO
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCRV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $27M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.31% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 91 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -0.70% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.35% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.74% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.07% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 1, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CCRV vs VOO Performance
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF (CCRV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCRV returned +1.35% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, CCRV is down 0.70% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, CCRV compounded at +3.74% per year against +22.09% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.07% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, CCRV has the edge at +14.07% annualized vs +13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.8% for CCRV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCRV charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCRV currently yields 4.31% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCRV or VOO?
CCRV has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCRV or VOO?
Over the past year CCRV returned +1.35% vs +20.69% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CCRV annualized +14.07% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCRV or VOO?
CCRV has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CCRV -24.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CCRV and VOO?
CCRV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCRV or VOO?
CCRV yields 4.31% while VOO yields 1.08%, so CCRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.