CCSB vs VXUS
CCSB vs VXUS
Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCSB | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $27M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.65% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.73% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.71% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.20% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.63% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 47.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Carbon Collective Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 11, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CCSB vs VXUS Performance
Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) is a ETF from Carbon Collective Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCSB returned +1.71% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CCSB is up 0.73% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, CCSB compounded at +4.20% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +0.63% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +4.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CCSB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.5% for CCSB and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCSB charges 0.51% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $5 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCSB currently yields 4.65% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CCSB and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7898 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCSB or VXUS?
CCSB has an expense ratio of 0.51% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCSB or VXUS?
Over the past year CCSB returned +1.71% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), CCSB annualized +4.52% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCSB or VXUS?
CCSB has been the more volatile fund at 47.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CCSB -63.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CCSB and VXUS?
CCSB and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCSB and VXUS?
CCSB and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7898 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCSB or VXUS?
CCSB yields 4.65% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so CCSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.