CGIC vs VXUS
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGIC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 202 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +12.56% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.10% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CGIC vs VXUS Performance
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGIC returned +27.10% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, CGIC is up 12.56% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.2% for CGIC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGIC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGIC charges 0.54% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $5 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGIC currently yields 1.67% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CGIC and VXUS share 114 holdings out of 7940 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGIC or VXUS?
CGIC has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGIC or VXUS?
Over the past year CGIC returned +27.10% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGIC annualized +22.44% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGIC or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.2% for CGIC. Worst drawdown: CGIC -13.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CGIC and VXUS?
CGIC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CGIC and VXUS?
CGIC and VXUS share 114 common holdings with a 16.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7940 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGIC or VXUS?
CGIC yields 1.67% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.