CGIC vs VOO
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CGIC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGIC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 202 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +12.56% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.10% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CGIC vs VOO Performance
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGIC returned +27.10% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, CGIC is up 12.56% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.2% for CGIC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGIC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGIC charges 0.54% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGIC currently yields 1.67% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CGIC and VOO share 5 holdings out of 693 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGIC or VOO?
CGIC has an expense ratio of 0.54% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGIC or VOO?
Over the past year CGIC returned +27.10% vs +23.71% for VOO, so CGIC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGIC annualized +22.44% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGIC or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.2% for CGIC. Worst drawdown: CGIC -13.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CGIC and VOO?
CGIC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGIC and VOO?
CGIC and VOO share 5 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 693 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGIC or VOO?
CGIC yields 1.67% while VOO yields 1.09%, so CGIC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.