CGIC vs IVV
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CGIC or IVV?
CGIC has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CGIC led over 1Y and the full window. CGIC is less concentrated, with 23.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGIC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.5B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.64% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 207 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.74%Best | +12.24% |
| 1Y Return | +24.57%Best | +18.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.0%Best | 11.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $15,354Best | $14,304 |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.3%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Sep 9, 2026 (2.2 years).
CGIC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
CGIC vs IVV Performance
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CGIC returned +24.57% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, CGIC is up 12.74% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 11.0% for CGIC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGIC and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGIC charges 0.54% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGIC currently yields 1.64% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
2.4% of CGIC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 3.9% of IVV's money is in holdings CGIC also owns.
IVV and CGIC share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 193 positions we hold weights for in CGIC and 505 in IVV, against full books of 207 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 490 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CGIC (95.4% of the fund), and 8 for CGIC that do not appear in IVV (4.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CGIC and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGIC or IVV?
CGIC has an expense ratio of 0.54% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $51 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGIC or IVV?
Over the past year CGIC returned +24.57% vs +18.61% for IVV, so CGIC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGIC annualized +21.52% vs +17.67% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGIC or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 11.0% for CGIC. Worst drawdown: CGIC -13.1% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both CGIC and IVV?
CGIC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGIC and IVV?
3.9% of IVV's money is in holdings CGIC also owns. 3.9% of IVV's is in holdings CGIC also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 193 positions we hold weights for in CGIC and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGIC or IVV?
CGIC yields 1.64% while IVV yields 1.06%, so CGIC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CGIC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CGIC led over 1Y and the full window. CGIC is less concentrated, with 23.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.