CGIC vs IVV
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CGIC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGIC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.54% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 202 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +12.07% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.68% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
CGIC vs IVV Performance
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF (CGIC) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CGIC returned +26.68% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, CGIC is up 12.07% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.2% for CGIC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.1% for CGIC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGIC charges 0.54% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $54 vs $3 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGIC currently yields 1.67% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CGIC and IVV share 5 holdings out of 693 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGIC or IVV?
CGIC has an expense ratio of 0.54% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGIC or IVV?
Over the past year CGIC returned +26.68% vs +22.61% for IVV, so CGIC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CGIC annualized +22.06% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGIC or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.2% for CGIC. Worst drawdown: CGIC -13.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CGIC and IVV?
CGIC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGIC and IVV?
CGIC and IVV share 5 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 693 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGIC or IVV?
CGIC yields 1.67% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CGIC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.