CGVV vs VYM
Capital Group US Large Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CGVV or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CGVV led over 1Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGVV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $144M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 68 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +14.65%Best | +11.71% |
| 1Y Return | +18.46%Best | +16.24% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 9.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,284 | $12,337Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.8% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.2 years).
CGVV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
CGVV vs VYM Performance
Capital Group US Large Value ETF (CGVV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGVV returned +18.46% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, CGVV is up 14.65% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for CGVV and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGVV charges 0.33% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $4 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGVV currently yields 0.81% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
42.6% of CGVV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 19.1% of VYM's money is in holdings CGVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in CGVV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 68 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 500 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for CGVV (79.3% of the fund), and 34 for CGVV that do not appear in VYM (54.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGVV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.51% | 3.82% | 1.31% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.30% | 2.63% | 1.33% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 3.23% | 0.49% | 2.74% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.84% | 1.86% | 0.02% |
| RTX:MXUnited Technologies Corp. | 2.17% | 1.18% | 0.99% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 1.93% | 1.21% | 0.72% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 2.04% | 1.07% | 0.97% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 2.28% | 0.34% | 1.94% |
| APDAir Products & Chemicals Inc. | 1.92% | 0.26% | 1.66% |
| BLKBlackrock Funding Inc/De | 1.48% | 0.68% | 0.80% |
42.6% of CGVV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGVV or VYM?
CGVV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGVV or VYM?
Over the past year CGVV returned +18.46% vs +16.24% for VYM, so CGVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CGVV annualized +18.70% vs +19.13% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGVV or VYM?
CGVV has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CGVV -10.1% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both CGVV and VYM?
CGVV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGVV and VYM?
42.6% of CGVV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 19.1% of VYM's is in holdings CGVV also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in CGVV and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGVV or VYM?
CGVV yields 0.81% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CGVV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CGVV led over 1Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.