CGVV vs VTI
Capital Group US Large Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CGVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGVV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.33% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $146M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 134 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.89% | +12.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.32% | +20.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
CGVV vs VTI Performance
Capital Group US Large Value ETF (CGVV) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGVV returned +25.32% while VTI returned +20.47%. Year to date, CGVV is up 18.89% versus a gain of 12.79% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.9% for CGVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.1% for CGVV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGVV charges 0.33% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $33 vs $3 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGVV currently yields 0.85% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CGVV and VTI share 58 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGVV or VTI?
CGVV has an expense ratio of 0.33% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGVV or VTI?
Over the past year CGVV returned +25.32% vs +20.47% for VTI, so CGVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CGVV annualized +23.62% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGVV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.9% for CGVV. Worst drawdown: CGVV -10.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CGVV and VTI?
CGVV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGVV and VTI?
CGVV and VTI share 58 common holdings with a 24.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGVV or VTI?
CGVV yields 0.85% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.