CLOU vs VYM
Global X Cloud Computing ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CLOU delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLOU | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $230M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +26.57% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.70% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.90% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.42% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 12, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CLOU vs VYM Performance
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLOU returned +31.70% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, CLOU is up 26.57% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, CLOU compounded at +11.90% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.42% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, CLOU has the edge at +9.11% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CLOU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for CLOU and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLOU charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLOU currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CLOU and VYM share 1 holdings out of 594 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CLOU | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | 0.26% | 0.98% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLOU or VYM?
CLOU has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLOU or VYM?
Over the past year CLOU returned +31.70% vs +26.05% for VYM, so CLOU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), CLOU annualized +9.11% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLOU or VYM?
CLOU has been the more volatile fund at 25.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CLOU -53.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CLOU and VYM?
CLOU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLOU and VYM?
CLOU and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 594 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLOU or VYM?
CLOU yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.