CLOU vs VTI
Global X Cloud Computing ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CLOU delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLOU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $365M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 79 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +25.26% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.81% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.65% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.66% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 12, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
CLOU vs VTI Performance
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLOU returned +26.81% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, CLOU is up 25.26% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, CLOU compounded at +12.65% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.66% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, CLOU has the edge at +8.92% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CLOU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for CLOU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLOU charges 0.68% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLOU currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CLOU and VTI share 28 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLOU or VTI?
CLOU has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLOU or VTI?
Over the past year CLOU returned +26.81% vs +21.39% for VTI, so CLOU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), CLOU annualized +8.92% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLOU or VTI?
CLOU has been the more volatile fund at 25.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CLOU -53.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CLOU and VTI?
CLOU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLOU and VTI?
CLOU and VTI share 28 common holdings with a 6.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLOU or VTI?
CLOU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.