CLOU vs VTI
Global X Cloud Computing ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CLOU or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CLOU led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLOU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $371M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 40 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +28.29%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +20.44%Best | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.59% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.18% | +11.94%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.8% | 17.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,424 | $17,576Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 12, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 16, 2019 to Sep 17, 2026 (7.4 years).
CLOU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
CLOU vs VTI Performance
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CLOU returned +20.44% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, CLOU is up 28.29% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Over three years, CLOU compounded at +13.59% per year against +20.89% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.18% and +11.94% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.47% annualized vs +9.18%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CLOU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.8% compared with 17.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for CLOU and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLOU charges 0.68% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLOU currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
89.7% of CLOU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 13.0% of VTI's money is in holdings CLOU also owns.
Most of CLOU is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
31 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in CLOU and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 40 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,127 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CLOU (84.5% of the fund), and 2 for CLOU that do not appear in VTI (1.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CLOU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 6.90% | 0.13% | 6.77% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.81% | 4.79% | 2.98% |
| PAYCPaycom Software Inc . | 5.53% | 0.01% | 5.52% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 4.98% | 0.12% | 4.86% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.42% | 3.65% | 2.23% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc | 4.76% | 0.16% | 4.60% |
| WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 4.77% | 0.04% | 4.73% |
| TWLOTwilio Inc. Class A | 4.55% | 0.04% | 4.51% |
| CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity | 4.31% | 0.20% | 4.11% |
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 4.10% | 0.12% | 3.98% |
89.7% of CLOU is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLOU or VTI?
CLOU has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CLOU or VTI?
Over the past year CLOU returned +20.44% vs +16.78% for VTI, so CLOU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), CLOU annualized +9.18% vs +14.47% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CLOU or VTI?
CLOU has been the more volatile fund at 25.8% annualized versus 17.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CLOU -53.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both CLOU and VTI?
CLOU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CLOU and VTI?
89.7% of CLOU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 13.0% of VTI's is in holdings CLOU also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in CLOU and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLOU or VTI?
CLOU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CLOU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CLOU led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.