CLOU vs IVV
Global X Cloud Computing ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CLOU delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CLOU | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $230M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 40 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +31.78% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.20% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.19% | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 12, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
CLOU vs IVV Performance
Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CLOU returned +32.20% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, CLOU is up 31.78% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Over three years, CLOU compounded at +13.39% per year against +21.80% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.19% and +13.37% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, CLOU has the edge at +9.71% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CLOU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for CLOU and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CLOU charges 0.68% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CLOU currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CLOU and IVV share 11 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CLOU or IVV?
CLOU has an expense ratio of 0.68% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CLOU or IVV?
Over the past year CLOU returned +32.20% vs +22.02% for IVV, so CLOU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), CLOU annualized +9.71% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CLOU or IVV?
CLOU has been the more volatile fund at 26.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CLOU -53.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CLOU and IVV?
CLOU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CLOU and IVV?
CLOU and IVV share 11 common holdings with a 6.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CLOU or IVV?
CLOU yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.