CNAV vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. CNAV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: CNAVMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCNAVVOOWinner
Expense Ratio1.31%0.03%
AUM$48M$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.09%
Holdings33509
YTD Return+24.25%+13.80%
1Y Return+37.83%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)33.0%14.1%
Max Drawdown-30.1%-34.3%
Fund FamilyMohr FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionOct 1, 2024Sep 7, 2010

CNAV vs VOO Performance

Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) is a ETF from Mohr Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNAV returned +37.83% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, CNAV is up 24.25% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CNAV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.1% for CNAV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CNAV charges 1.31% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $131 vs $3 annually, a gap of $128 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNAV currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

10.3%overlap

CNAV and VOO share 26 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.3% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CNAVWeight in VOODifference
AMD4.73%1.47%3.26%
WDC5.65%0.34%5.31%
MU3.45%2.02%1.43%
FIXProProPro
CSCOProProPro
CATProProPro
INTCProProPro
DELLProProPro
NTAPProProPro
GLWProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings CNAV shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$149/yr Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CNAV or VOO?

CNAV has an expense ratio of 1.31% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $128 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CNAV or VOO?

Over the past year CNAV returned +37.83% vs +23.71% for VOO, so CNAV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CNAV annualized +27.27% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CNAV or VOO?

CNAV has been the more volatile fund at 33.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CNAV -30.1% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both CNAV and VOO?

CNAV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CNAV and VOO?

CNAV and VOO share 26 common holdings with a 10.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CNAV or VOO?

CNAV yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.