CNBS vs IVV
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNBS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $77M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -4.40% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.58% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -15.50% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -35.23% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 64.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
CNBS vs IVV Performance
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CNBS returned -4.58% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, CNBS is down 4.40% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, CNBS compounded at -15.50% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -35.23% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -28.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNBS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 64.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.1% for CNBS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNBS charges 0.76% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNBS currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CNBS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNBS or IVV?
CNBS has an expense ratio of 0.76% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNBS or IVV?
Over the past year CNBS returned -4.58% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), CNBS annualized -28.19% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNBS or IVV?
CNBS has been the more volatile fund at 64.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CNBS -97.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CNBS and IVV?
CNBS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNBS and IVV?
CNBS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNBS or IVV?
CNBS yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.