CNBS vs SCHD
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNBS | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $77M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -6.87% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | -11.66% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -16.26% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -36.01% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 64.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.1% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2019 | Oct 20, 2011 |
CNBS vs SCHD Performance
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year CNBS returned -11.66% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, CNBS is down 6.87% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, CNBS compounded at -16.26% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -36.01% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs -28.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNBS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 64.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.1% for CNBS and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNBS charges 0.76% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $6 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNBS currently yields 0.00% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
CNBS and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 116 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNBS or SCHD?
CNBS has an expense ratio of 0.76% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNBS or SCHD?
Over the past year CNBS returned -11.66% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), CNBS annualized -28.51% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNBS or SCHD?
CNBS has been the more volatile fund at 64.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: CNBS -97.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both CNBS and SCHD?
CNBS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNBS and SCHD?
CNBS and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 116 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNBS or SCHD?
CNBS yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.