CNBS vs VYM
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNBS | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $77M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -7.98% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | -10.51% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -16.59% | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -36.15% | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 64.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CNBS vs VYM Performance
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNBS returned -10.51% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, CNBS is down 7.98% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Over three years, CNBS compounded at -16.59% per year against +19.14% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -36.15% and +12.45% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs -28.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNBS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 64.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.1% for CNBS and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNBS charges 0.76% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $4 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNBS currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CNBS and VYM share 0 holdings out of 619 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNBS or VYM?
CNBS has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNBS or VYM?
Over the past year CNBS returned -10.51% vs +23.85% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), CNBS annualized -28.60% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNBS or VYM?
CNBS has been the more volatile fund at 64.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CNBS -97.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CNBS and VYM?
CNBS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNBS and VYM?
CNBS and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 619 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNBS or VYM?
CNBS yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.