CNBS vs VOO
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNBS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $77M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -6.87% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | -11.66% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -16.26% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -36.01% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 64.5% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CNBS vs VOO Performance
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNBS returned -11.66% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, CNBS is down 6.87% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, CNBS compounded at -16.26% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -36.01% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs -28.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNBS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 64.5% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.1% for CNBS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNBS charges 0.76% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNBS currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CNBS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNBS or VOO?
CNBS has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNBS or VOO?
Over the past year CNBS returned -11.66% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), CNBS annualized -28.51% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNBS or VOO?
CNBS has been the more volatile fund at 64.5% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CNBS -97.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CNBS and VOO?
CNBS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNBS and VOO?
CNBS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNBS or VOO?
CNBS yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.