CNBS vs VTI
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CNBS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.76% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $77M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -4.40% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.58% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -15.50% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -35.23% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 64.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 23, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
CNBS vs VTI Performance
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CNBS returned -4.58% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, CNBS is down 4.40% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, CNBS compounded at -15.50% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -35.23% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs -28.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CNBS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 64.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.1% for CNBS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CNBS charges 0.76% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $76 vs $3 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CNBS currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CNBS and VTI share 4 holdings out of 2799 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CNBS or VTI?
CNBS has an expense ratio of 0.76% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CNBS or VTI?
Over the past year CNBS returned -4.58% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), CNBS annualized -28.19% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CNBS or VTI?
CNBS has been the more volatile fund at 64.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CNBS -97.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CNBS and VTI?
CNBS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CNBS and VTI?
CNBS and VTI share 4 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2799 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CNBS or VTI?
CNBS yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.