COLO vs IVV
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. COLO delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COLO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $213M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.23% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +38.49% | +12.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +62.36% | +20.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +41.69% | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.06% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2009 | May 15, 2000 |
COLO vs IVV Performance
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year COLO returned +62.36% while IVV returned +20.70%. Year to date, COLO is up 38.49% versus a gain of 12.96% for IVV.
Over three years, COLO compounded at +41.69% per year against +22.10% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +19.06% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs +4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COLO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.1% for COLO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COLO charges 0.62% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COLO currently yields 4.23% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
COLO and IVV share 0 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COLO or IVV?
COLO has an expense ratio of 0.62% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COLO or IVV?
Over the past year COLO returned +62.36% vs +20.70% for IVV, so COLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), COLO annualized +4.64% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COLO or IVV?
COLO has been the more volatile fund at 26.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: COLO -83.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both COLO and IVV?
COLO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COLO and IVV?
COLO and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COLO or IVV?
COLO yields 4.23% while IVV yields 1.10%, so COLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.