COLO vs QQQ
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. COLO delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COLO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $213M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.23% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +38.12% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +64.53% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +41.22% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.98% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2009 | Mar 10, 1999 |
COLO vs QQQ Performance
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year COLO returned +64.53% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, COLO is up 38.12% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, COLO compounded at +41.22% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +19.98% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 26.8% for COLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.1% for COLO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COLO charges 0.62% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $18 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COLO currently yields 4.23% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
COLO and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 125 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COLO or QQQ?
COLO has an expense ratio of 0.62% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COLO or QQQ?
Over the past year COLO returned +64.53% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so COLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), COLO annualized +4.62% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COLO or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 26.8% for COLO. Worst drawdown: COLO -83.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both COLO and QQQ?
COLO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COLO and QQQ?
COLO and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 125 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COLO or QQQ?
COLO yields 4.23% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so COLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.