COLO vs VTI
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. COLO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COLO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $213M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.23% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +38.49% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +62.36% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +41.69% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.06% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2009 | May 24, 2001 |
COLO vs VTI Performance
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COLO returned +62.36% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, COLO is up 38.49% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, COLO compounded at +41.69% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +19.06% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs +4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COLO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.1% for COLO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COLO charges 0.62% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COLO currently yields 4.23% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
COLO and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2810 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COLO or VTI?
COLO has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COLO or VTI?
Over the past year COLO returned +62.36% vs +21.12% for VTI, so COLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), COLO annualized +4.64% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COLO or VTI?
COLO has been the more volatile fund at 26.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: COLO -83.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both COLO and VTI?
COLO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COLO and VTI?
COLO and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2810 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COLO or VTI?
COLO yields 4.23% while VTI yields 1.07%, so COLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.