COLO vs VXUS
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, COLO or VXUS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. COLO led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VXUS over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COLO | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $174M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.15% | 2.38% |
| Holdings | 60 | 9,293 |
| YTD Return | +33.12%Best | +6.50% |
| 1Y Return | +34.61%Best | +12.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.53%Best | +18.15% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.72%Best | +7.38% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.1% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -82.5% | -39.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $21,663Best | $14,276 |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2009 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 28, 2011 to Nov 6, 2026 (15.8 years).
COLO vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.8 years both funds cover.
COLO vs VXUS Performance
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COLO returned +34.61% while VXUS returned +12.09%. Year to date, COLO is up 33.12% versus a gain of 6.50% for VXUS.
Over three years, COLO compounded at +40.53% per year against +18.15% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +16.72% and +7.38% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.30% annualized vs -1.48%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COLO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -82.5% for COLO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COLO charges 0.62% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $5 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COLO currently yields 4.15% against 2.38% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 57.6% of COLO's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 89.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in COLO and 8,463 in VXUS, against full books of 60 and 9,293.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in COLO | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFCIBEST:COGrupo Cibest Pref Sa | 15.66% | 0.01% | 15.65% |
| ECO:COEcopetrol Sa | 7.74% | 0.01% | 7.73% |
| ISA:COInterconexion Electrica Sa | 7.57% | 0.01% | 7.56% |
| CIBEST:COGrupo Cibest Sa | 6.65% | 0.01% | 6.64% |
| CEMARGOS:COCementos Argos Sa | 4.52% | 0.00% | 4.52% |
| PFDAVIGR:CODavivienda Group Sa | 4.52% | 0.00% | 4.52% |
| MAS:COMineros Sa | 2.87% | 0.00% | 2.87% |
| COPEC:CLEmpresas Copec Sa | 2.42% | 0.01% | 2.41% |
| PXT:CAParex Resources Inc | 2.31% | 0.00% | 2.31% |
| BEPC:CABrookfield Renewable Corp | 2.01% | 0.01% | 2.00% |
57.6% of COLO is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COLO or VXUS?
COLO has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, COLO or VXUS?
Over the past year COLO returned +34.61% vs +12.09% for VXUS, so COLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), COLO annualized -1.48% vs +4.30% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, COLO or VXUS?
COLO has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: COLO -82.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both COLO and VXUS?
COLO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between COLO and VXUS?
At least 57.6% of COLO's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in COLO and 8,463 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, COLO or VXUS?
COLO yields 4.15% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so COLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than COLO?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. COLO led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VXUS over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.