COLO vs VYM
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, COLO or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. COLO led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COLO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $174M | $95.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.15% | 2.23% |
| Holdings | 60 | 610 |
| YTD Return | +36.53%Best | +14.40% |
| 1Y Return | +35.30%Best | +18.20% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.86%Best | +19.83% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.46%Best | +11.26% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.6% | 13.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -83.1% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,359Best | $17,049 |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.7% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2009 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 9, 2009 to Nov 9, 2026 (17.7 years).
COLO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 17.7 years both funds cover.
COLO vs VYM Performance
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COLO returned +35.30% while VYM returned +18.20%. Year to date, COLO is up 36.53% versus a gain of 14.40% for VYM.
Over three years, COLO compounded at +40.86% per year against +19.83% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +17.46% and +11.26% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +10.93% annualized vs +4.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COLO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.6% compared with 13.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.1% for COLO and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COLO charges 0.62% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $4 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COLO currently yields 4.15% against 2.23% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
2.2% of COLO's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
COLO and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in COLO and 602 in VYM, against full books of 60 and 610.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 577 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for COLO (98.6% of the fund), and 1 for COLO that do not appear in VYM (3.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in COLO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIGO:LUMillicom Intl Cellular-Sdr | 2.21% | 0.03% | 2.18% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of COLO and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COLO or VYM?
COLO has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, COLO or VYM?
Over the past year COLO returned +35.30% vs +18.20% for VYM, so COLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), COLO annualized +4.49% vs +10.93% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, COLO or VYM?
COLO has been the more volatile fund at 26.6% annualized versus 13.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: COLO -83.1% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both COLO and VYM?
COLO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between COLO and VYM?
2.2% of COLO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.0% of VYM's is in holdings COLO also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in COLO and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, COLO or VYM?
COLO yields 4.15% while VYM yields 2.23%, so COLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than COLO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. COLO led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.