COLO vs VYM
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. COLO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | COLO | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $213M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.23% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +38.52% | +15.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +62.40% | +23.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +41.76% | +19.02% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.82% | +12.19% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 5, 2009 | Nov 10, 2006 |
COLO vs VYM Performance
Global X MSCI Colombia ETF (COLO) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year COLO returned +62.40% while VYM returned +23.95%. Year to date, COLO is up 38.52% versus a gain of 15.84% for VYM.
Over three years, COLO compounded at +41.76% per year against +19.02% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +19.82% and +12.19% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
COLO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.1% for COLO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
COLO charges 0.62% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $4 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, COLO currently yields 4.23% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
COLO and VYM share 0 holdings out of 626 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, COLO or VYM?
COLO has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, COLO or VYM?
Over the past year COLO returned +62.40% vs +23.95% for VYM, so COLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), COLO annualized +4.64% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, COLO or VYM?
COLO has been the more volatile fund at 26.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: COLO -83.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both COLO and VYM?
COLO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between COLO and VYM?
COLO and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 626 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, COLO or VYM?
COLO yields 4.23% while VYM yields 2.24%, so COLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.