CORB vs IVV
AB Core Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CORB or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORB | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 729 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -3.53% | +12.53%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.41% | +15.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.77% |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CORB vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CORB vs IVV Performance
AB Core Bond ETF (CORB) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CORB returned -3.41% while IVV returned +15.78%. Year to date, CORB is down 3.53% versus a gain of 12.53% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORB charges 0.28% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORB currently yields 3.12% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.5% of IVV's money is in holdings CORB also owns.
Stated as a floor: for CORB, our book for it covers 81.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 432 positions we hold weights for in CORB and 490 in IVV, against full books of 729 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CORB | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSGoldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The), Series V | 0.07% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CORB and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORB or IVV?
CORB has an expense ratio of 0.28% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CORB or IVV?
Over the past year CORB returned -3.41% vs +15.78% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORB or IVV?
CORB yields 3.12% while IVV yields 1.06%, so CORB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CORB?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.