CORB vs IVV

CORB vs IVV

Which is better, CORB or IVV?

IVV has been ahead.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCORBIVV
Expense Ratio0.28%0.03%Best
AUM$1.2B$850.0B
Dividend Yield3.79%1.09%
Holdings1,4531,018
YTD Return-1.66%+10.70%Best
1Y Return-1.54%+11.31%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.04%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.65%
Volatility (annualized)5.2%Best13.5%
Fund FamilyAllianceBernstein L.P.iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Blend
InceptionNov 7, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

CORB vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CORB vs IVV Performance

AB Core Bond ETF (CORB) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CORB returned -1.54% while IVV returned +11.31%. Year to date, CORB is down 1.66% versus a gain of 10.70% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.5% compared with 5.2% for CORB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.18. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CORB charges 0.28% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORB currently yields 3.79% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in CORB0.4%

At least 0.4% of IVV's money is in holdings CORB also owns.

Stated as a floor: for CORB, our book for it covers 64.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.

1 positions in common, counted across the 403 positions we hold weights for in CORB and 505 in IVV, against full books of 1,453 and 1,018.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CORBWeight in IVVDifference
GSGoldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The), Series V0.06%0.38%0.32%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CORB and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CORBIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CORB or IVV?

CORB has an expense ratio of 0.28% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CORB or IVV?

Over the past year CORB returned -1.54% vs +11.31% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CORB or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.5% annualized versus 5.2% for CORB.

Should I hold both CORB and IVV?

CORB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.18, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CORB or IVV?

CORB yields 3.79% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CORB currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than CORB?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.