CORB vs RIGS
AB Core Bond ETF vs ALPS Strategic Income Fund
Which is better, CORB or RIGS?
RIGS has been ahead.
CORB has a lower expense ratio. RIGS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CORB | RIGS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28%Best | 0.46% |
| AUM | $1.2B | $56M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.56% | 5.02% |
| Holdings | 727 | 84 |
| YTD Return | -3.08% | -0.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.96% | -0.44%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.06% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +1.67% |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | ALPS Advisors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Nov 7, 2025 | Oct 7, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
CORB vs RIGS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CORB vs RIGS Performance
AB Core Bond ETF (CORB) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and ALPS Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Over the past year CORB returned -2.96% while RIGS returned -0.44%. Year to date, CORB is down 3.08% versus a loss of 0.64% for RIGS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CORB charges 0.28% per year while RIGS charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $46 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CORB currently yields 3.56% against 5.02% for RIGS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 429 holdings in CORB and 58 in RIGS, totalling 81.7% and 72.5% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 4 positions appear in both.
4 positions in common, counted across the 429 positions we hold weights for in CORB and 58 in RIGS, against full books of 727 and 84.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CORB | Weight in RIGS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| T 4.5 02/15/44U.S. Treasury Bonds | 0.40% | 4.72% | 4.32% |
| T 4.375 05/15/34United States Treasury Note/Bondus Treasury N/B | 0.17% | 4.73% | 4.56% |
| T 4.75 11/15/43Us Treas Bds 4.75% 11/15/43 | 0.58% | 4.03% | 3.45% |
| T 4.75 02/15/37Us Treasury N/B 02/37 4.75 | 0.13% | 2.53% | 2.40% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CORB and RIGS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CORB or RIGS?
CORB has an expense ratio of 0.28% while RIGS charges 0.46%. CORB is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CORB or RIGS?
Over the past year CORB returned -2.96% vs -0.44% for RIGS, so RIGS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CORB or RIGS?
CORB yields 3.56% while RIGS yields 5.02%, so RIGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RIGS better than CORB?
CORB has a lower expense ratio. RIGS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.