CRAK vs QQQ
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CRAK delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRAK | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $183M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 36 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +60.84% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +80.47% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.46% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.47% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CRAK vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CRAK returned +80.47% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, CRAK is up 60.84% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, CRAK compounded at +24.46% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +20.47% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CRAK has the edge at +13.16% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 23.9% for CRAK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for CRAK and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRAK charges 0.61% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $18 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRAK currently yields 1.41% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CRAK and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 127 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRAK or QQQ?
CRAK has an expense ratio of 0.61% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CRAK or QQQ?
Over the past year CRAK returned +80.47% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so CRAK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CRAK annualized +13.16% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CRAK or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 23.9% for CRAK. Worst drawdown: CRAK -58.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CRAK and QQQ?
CRAK and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CRAK and QQQ?
CRAK and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 127 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRAK or QQQ?
CRAK yields 1.41% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CRAK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.