CRAK vs IVV
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CRAK or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CRAK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRAK | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.61% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $183M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 26 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +70.86%Best | +12.70% |
| 1Y Return | +83.72%Best | +19.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.75%Best | +21.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.82%Best | +12.75% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $25,745Best | $18,221 |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.3% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 19, 2015 to Sep 8, 2026 (11.1 years).
CRAK vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.1 years both funds cover.
CRAK vs IVV Performance
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) is an ETF from VanEck and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CRAK returned +83.72% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, CRAK is up 70.86% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Over three years, CRAK compounded at +24.75% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +20.82% and +12.75% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, CRAK has the edge at +13.71% annualized vs +13.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRAK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 15.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for CRAK and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRAK charges 0.61% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $61 vs $3 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRAK currently yields 1.41% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
22.0% of CRAK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's money is in holdings CRAK also owns.
CRAK and IVV share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in CRAK and 504 in IVV, against full books of 26 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 490 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CRAK (98.8% of the fund), and 5 for CRAK that do not appear in IVV (12.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
22.0% of CRAK is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRAK or IVV?
CRAK has an expense ratio of 0.61% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CRAK or IVV?
Over the past year CRAK returned +83.72% vs +19.36% for IVV, so CRAK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), CRAK annualized +13.71% vs +13.26% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CRAK or IVV?
CRAK has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 15.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CRAK -58.8% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both CRAK and IVV?
CRAK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CRAK and IVV?
22.0% of CRAK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's is in holdings CRAK also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in CRAK and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRAK or IVV?
CRAK yields 1.41% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CRAK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CRAK?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CRAK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.