CRDU vs QQQ

CRDU vs QQQ

Which is better, CRDU or QQQ?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCRDUQQQ
Expense Ratio1.30%0.18%Best
AUM$62M$498.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.42%
Holdings6321
YTD Return-24.01%+22.67%Best
1Y Return-45.01%+24.33%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+29.05%
5Y Return (annualized)-+17.00%
Volatility (annualized)261.9%21.0%Best
Max Drawdown-95.5%-12.0%Best
$10,000 over 1 years$4,627$12,626Best
Fund FamilyTradr ETFsInvesco (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Growth
InceptionSep 15, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1 years).

CRDU vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CRDU vs QQQ Performance

Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF (CRDU) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CRDU returned -45.01% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, CRDU is down 24.01% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CRDU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 261.9% compared with 21.0% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.5% for CRDU and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CRDU charges 1.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $18 annually, a gap of $112 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRDU currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CRDU and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CRDUQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CRDU or QQQ?

CRDU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $112 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CRDU or QQQ?

Over the past year CRDU returned -45.01% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CRDU annualized -53.73% vs +26.26% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CRDU or QQQ?

CRDU has been the more volatile fund at 261.9% annualized versus 21.0% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: CRDU -95.5% vs QQQ -12.0%.

Should I hold both CRDU and QQQ?

CRDU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CRDU or QQQ?

CRDU yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than CRDU?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.