CRDU vs VTI

CRDU vs VTI

Which is better, CRDU or VTI?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCRDUVTI
Expense Ratio1.30%0.03%Best
AUM$62M$690.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings63,524
YTD Return-28.18%+14.14%Best
1Y Return-46.28%+16.22%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.93%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.76%
Volatility (annualized)261.8%12.5%Best
Max Drawdown-95.5%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.1 years$4,064$11,956Best
Fund FamilyTradr ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 15, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2025 to Oct 5, 2026 (1.1 years).

CRDU vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CRDU vs VTI Performance

Tradr 2X Long CRDO Daily ETF (CRDU) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CRDU returned -46.28% while VTI returned +16.22%. Year to date, CRDU is down 28.18% versus a gain of 14.14% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CRDU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 261.8% compared with 12.5% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -95.5% for CRDU and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CRDU charges 1.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRDU currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of CRDU and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

CRDUVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CRDU or VTI?

CRDU has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $127 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, CRDU or VTI?

Over the past year CRDU returned -46.28% vs +16.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CRDU annualized -55.89% vs +17.63% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, CRDU or VTI?

CRDU has been the more volatile fund at 261.8% annualized versus 12.5% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CRDU -95.5% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both CRDU and VTI?

CRDU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, CRDU or VTI?

CRDU yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than CRDU?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.