CRUX vs VOO
Columbia Core Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CRUX or VOO?
Intermediate Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CRUX | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.81% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 474 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -1.59% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Intermediate Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 16, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CRUX vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CRUX vs VOO Performance
Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, CRUX is down 1.59% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CRUX charges 0.32% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $3 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CRUX currently yields 1.81% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.1% of VOO's money is in holdings CRUX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for CRUX, our book for it covers 26.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, CRUX as of Aug 17, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 130 positions we hold weights for in CRUX and 505 in VOO, against full books of 474 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CRUX | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMUST-Mobile Usa, Inc. 3.875% 15-Apr-2030 | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.07% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CRUX and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CRUX or VOO?
CRUX has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, CRUX or VOO?
CRUX yields 1.81% while VOO yields 1.04%, so CRUX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than CRUX?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.