CSNR vs QQQ
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CSNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSNR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $99M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.87% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +19.54% | +17.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.97% | +24.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CSNR vs QQQ Performance
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CSNR returned +39.97% while QQQ returned +24.93%. Year to date, CSNR is up 19.54% versus a gain of 17.30% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.5% for CSNR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for CSNR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.18. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSNR charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSNR currently yields 1.87% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CSNR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 160 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSNR or QQQ?
CSNR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSNR or QQQ?
Over the past year CSNR returned +39.97% vs +24.93% for QQQ, so CSNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSNR annualized +32.35% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSNR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.5% for CSNR. Worst drawdown: CSNR -15.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CSNR and QQQ?
CSNR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.18, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSNR and QQQ?
CSNR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 160 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSNR or QQQ?
CSNR yields 1.87% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CSNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.