CSNR vs QQQ
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CSNR or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CSNR led over 1Y and the full window. CSNR is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSNR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $118M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 61 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +16.46% | +21.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +25.88%Best | +23.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.25% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3%Best | 19.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $15,142Best | $14,352 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.1%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 5, 2025 to Oct 1, 2026 (1.7 years).
CSNR vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
CSNR vs QQQ Performance
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CSNR returned +25.88% while QQQ returned +23.58%. Year to date, CSNR is up 16.46% versus a gain of 21.44% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 17.3% for CSNR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for CSNR and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.16. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSNR charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSNR currently yields 1.75% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 58 holdings in CSNR and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.8% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, CSNR as of Jul 29, 2026 and QQQ as of Sep 15, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in CSNR and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 61 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for CSNR (97.8% of the fund), and 28 for CSNR that do not appear in QQQ (44.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CSNR and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSNR or QQQ?
CSNR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CSNR or QQQ?
Over the past year CSNR returned +25.88% vs +23.58% for QQQ, so CSNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSNR annualized +27.64% vs +23.68% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CSNR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 17.3% for CSNR. Worst drawdown: CSNR -15.3% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both CSNR and QQQ?
CSNR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.16, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSNR or QQQ?
CSNR yields 1.75% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so CSNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CSNR?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. CSNR led over 1Y and the full window. CSNR is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.