CSNR vs VTI
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CSNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSNR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $99M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.87% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.54% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.97% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
CSNR vs VTI Performance
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSNR returned +39.97% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, CSNR is up 19.54% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for CSNR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSNR charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSNR currently yields 1.87% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CSNR and VTI share 24 holdings out of 2821 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSNR or VTI?
CSNR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSNR or VTI?
Over the past year CSNR returned +39.97% vs +21.12% for VTI, so CSNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSNR annualized +32.35% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSNR or VTI?
CSNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CSNR -15.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CSNR and VTI?
CSNR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSNR and VTI?
CSNR and VTI share 24 common holdings with a 2.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2821 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSNR or VTI?
CSNR yields 1.87% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CSNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.