CSNR vs VTI
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CSNR or VTI?
CSNR has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CSNR led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSNR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $118M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.75% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 61 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +16.46%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +25.88%Best | +15.23% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $15,142Best | $12,862 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.1% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 5, 2025 to Oct 1, 2026 (1.7 years).
CSNR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
CSNR vs VTI Performance
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSNR returned +25.88% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, CSNR is up 16.46% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 12.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for CSNR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSNR charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSNR currently yields 1.75% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
40.4% of CSNR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.3% of VTI's money is in holdings CSNR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
25 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in CSNR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 61 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,130 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for CSNR (95.1% of the fund), and 3 for CSNR that do not appear in VTI (3.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CSNR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 6.22% | 0.89% | 5.33% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 4.52% | 0.02% | 4.50% |
| CTVACorteva Inc Ctva | 2.94% | 0.07% | 2.87% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 2.58% | 0.14% | 2.44% |
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 2.57% | 0.12% | 2.45% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 2.25% | 0.20% | 2.05% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 2.24% | 0.12% | 2.12% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 1.91% | 0.21% | 1.70% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 1.63% | 0.10% | 1.53% |
| VLOValero Energy | 1.11% | 0.13% | 0.98% |
40.4% of CSNR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSNR or VTI?
CSNR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CSNR or VTI?
Over the past year CSNR returned +25.88% vs +15.23% for VTI, so CSNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSNR annualized +27.64% vs +15.96% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CSNR or VTI?
CSNR has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 12.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CSNR -15.3% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both CSNR and VTI?
CSNR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CSNR and VTI?
40.4% of CSNR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.3% of VTI's is in holdings CSNR also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in CSNR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSNR or VTI?
CSNR yields 1.75% while VTI yields 1.03%, so CSNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CSNR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. CSNR led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.