CSNR vs VOO
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. CSNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSNR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $99M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.87% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.54% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.97% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
CSNR vs VOO Performance
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSNR returned +39.97% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, CSNR is up 19.54% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for CSNR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSNR charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSNR currently yields 1.87% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
CSNR and VOO share 16 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSNR or VOO?
CSNR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSNR or VOO?
Over the past year CSNR returned +39.97% vs +20.69% for VOO, so CSNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSNR annualized +32.35% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSNR or VOO?
CSNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: CSNR -15.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both CSNR and VOO?
CSNR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSNR and VOO?
CSNR and VOO share 16 common holdings with a 2.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSNR or VOO?
CSNR yields 1.87% while VOO yields 1.08%, so CSNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.