CSNR vs IVV
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CSNR or IVV?
CSNR has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CSNR led over 1Y and the full window. CSNR is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSNR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $109M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.87% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 61 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +26.42%Best | +12.70% |
| 1Y Return | +42.88%Best | +19.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.75% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $16,302Best | $12,924 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.1%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 5, 2025 to Sep 8, 2026 (1.6 years).
CSNR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
CSNR vs IVV Performance
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CSNR returned +42.88% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, CSNR is up 26.42% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 13.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for CSNR and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSNR charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSNR currently yields 1.87% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
34.0% of CSNR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.4% of IVV's money is in holdings CSNR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in CSNR and 504 in IVV, against full books of 61 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 477 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CSNR (96.8% of the fund), and 12 for CSNR that do not appear in IVV (10.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CSNR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp | 6.22% | 0.94% | 5.28% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 4.52% | 0.02% | 4.50% |
| CTVACorteva Inc. | 2.94% | 0.08% | 2.86% |
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 2.58% | 0.17% | 2.41% |
| FCXFreeport-McMoran Copper & Gold Inc | 2.57% | 0.15% | 2.42% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 2.25% | 0.21% | 2.04% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 2.24% | 0.12% | 2.12% |
| DEDeere & Co. | 1.91% | 0.23% | 1.68% |
| SLBSlb Ltd. | 1.63% | 0.11% | 1.52% |
| VLOValero Energy Corp | 1.11% | 0.13% | 0.98% |
34.0% of CSNR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSNR or IVV?
CSNR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CSNR or IVV?
Over the past year CSNR returned +42.88% vs +19.36% for IVV, so CSNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSNR annualized +35.72% vs +17.39% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CSNR or IVV?
CSNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 13.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CSNR -15.3% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both CSNR and IVV?
CSNR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CSNR and IVV?
34.0% of CSNR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.4% of IVV's is in holdings CSNR also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in CSNR and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSNR or IVV?
CSNR yields 1.87% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CSNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CSNR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CSNR led over 1Y and the full window. CSNR is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.