CSNR vs IVV
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. CSNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSNR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $99M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.87% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +21.89% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.20% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
CSNR vs IVV Performance
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CSNR returned +43.20% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, CSNR is up 21.89% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for CSNR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSNR charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSNR currently yields 1.87% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CSNR and IVV share 16 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSNR or IVV?
CSNR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSNR or IVV?
Over the past year CSNR returned +43.20% vs +21.62% for IVV, so CSNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSNR annualized +33.98% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSNR or IVV?
CSNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: CSNR -15.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CSNR and IVV?
CSNR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSNR and IVV?
CSNR and IVV share 16 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSNR or IVV?
CSNR yields 1.87% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CSNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.