CSNR vs VYM
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, CSNR or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CSNR led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSNR | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $112M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.87% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 61 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +18.69%Best | +9.59% |
| 1Y Return | +27.81%Best | +13.66% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $15,082Best | $12,148 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.1% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 5, 2025 to Sep 28, 2026 (1.6 years).
CSNR vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
CSNR vs VYM Performance
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSNR returned +27.81% while VYM returned +13.66%. Year to date, CSNR is up 18.69% versus a gain of 9.59% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 10.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for CSNR and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSNR charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSNR currently yields 1.87% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
27.4% of CSNR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 5.5% of VYM's money is in holdings CSNR also owns.
CSNR and VYM share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in CSNR and 557 in VYM, against full books of 61 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 514 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for CSNR (91.6% of the fund), and 14 for CSNR that do not appear in VYM (16.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CSNR | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 6.22% | 2.63% | 3.59% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 4.52% | 0.06% | 4.46% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 2.58% | 0.41% | 2.17% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 2.25% | 0.60% | 1.65% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 2.24% | 0.34% | 1.90% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 1.63% | 0.30% | 1.33% |
| VLOValero Energy | 1.11% | 0.38% | 0.73% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 1.12% | 0.23% | 0.89% |
| IPInternational Paper Co. | 1.18% | 0.09% | 1.09% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 1.17% | 0.08% | 1.09% |
27.4% of CSNR is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSNR or VYM?
CSNR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CSNR or VYM?
Over the past year CSNR returned +27.81% vs +13.66% for VYM, so CSNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSNR annualized +29.28% vs +12.93% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CSNR or VYM?
CSNR has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 10.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CSNR -15.3% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both CSNR and VYM?
CSNR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CSNR and VYM?
27.4% of CSNR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 5.5% of VYM's is in holdings CSNR also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in CSNR and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSNR or VYM?
CSNR yields 1.87% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than CSNR?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CSNR led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.