CSNR vs VYM
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. CSNR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CSNR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $99M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.87% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +19.54% | +15.75% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.97% | +23.85% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CSNR vs VYM Performance
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSNR returned +39.97% while VYM returned +23.85%. Year to date, CSNR is up 19.54% versus a gain of 15.75% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CSNR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.3% for CSNR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CSNR charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSNR currently yields 1.87% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CSNR and VYM share 14 holdings out of 647 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CSNR or VYM?
CSNR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CSNR or VYM?
Over the past year CSNR returned +39.97% vs +23.85% for VYM, so CSNR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSNR annualized +32.35% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CSNR or VYM?
CSNR has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CSNR -15.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CSNR and VYM?
CSNR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CSNR and VYM?
CSNR and VYM share 14 common holdings with a 5.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 647 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CSNR or VYM?
CSNR yields 1.87% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.