DBJP vs VTI
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DBJP delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBJP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $696M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 182 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +25.47% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.73% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +29.80% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.71% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
DBJP vs VTI Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DBJP returned +43.73% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, DBJP is up 25.47% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, DBJP compounded at +29.80% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +22.71% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, DBJP has the edge at +11.91% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DBJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DBJP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBJP charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBJP currently yields 1.25% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DBJP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2952 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBJP or VTI?
DBJP has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DBJP or VTI?
Over the past year DBJP returned +43.73% vs +22.19% for VTI, so DBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), DBJP annualized +11.91% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DBJP or VTI?
DBJP has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DBJP -35.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DBJP and VTI?
DBJP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DBJP and VTI?
DBJP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2952 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBJP or VTI?
DBJP yields 1.25% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DBJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.