DBJP vs VTI
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DBJP or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DBJP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DBJP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $723M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 171 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +22.69%Best | +13.95% |
| 1Y Return | +42.64%Best | +21.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.13%Best | +21.10% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.13%Best | +11.77% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $26,077Best | $17,443 |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 9, 2011 to Sep 3, 2026 (15.2 years).
DBJP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.2 years both funds cover.
DBJP vs VTI Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DBJP returned +42.64% while VTI returned +21.44%. Year to date, DBJP is up 22.69% versus a gain of 13.95% for VTI.
Over three years, DBJP compounded at +27.13% per year against +21.10% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +21.13% and +11.77% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.66% annualized vs +11.70%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DBJP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DBJP and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DBJP charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DBJP currently yields 1.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 168 holdings in DBJP and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 98.2% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 168 positions we hold weights for in DBJP and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 171 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DBJP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DBJP or VTI?
DBJP has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DBJP or VTI?
Over the past year DBJP returned +42.64% vs +21.44% for VTI, so DBJP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), DBJP annualized +11.70% vs +12.66% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DBJP or VTI?
DBJP has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DBJP -35.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both DBJP and VTI?
DBJP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DBJP or VTI?
DBJP yields 1.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DBJP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DBJP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DBJP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.